SOLVE
AI & Automation Solutions
SOW #1 Deliverable

Technical
Solutions
Roadmap

Prepared for Gordon Law Group, P.C. — documenting mapped workflows, identified automation opportunities, projected ROI, and a recommended phased implementation plan for the IntelliFirm AI suite.

Gordon Law Group
May 26, 2026
MSA/SOW #1
Solve Technology
1.0 — Final
Confidential
Section 01

Mapped Workflows

Over the paid discovery engagement (April 27 – May 18, 2026), Solve conducted structured sessions with Joshua Jewkes (litigation), Melissa (front-office), and Corbin Gordon (municipal law). Four workflows were observed, documented, and analyzed as automation candidates.

⚖️  Billable Time Capture

1
Attorney completes legal work — drafting, calls, court appearances, travel
2
Deferred logging: Notes recorded on a yellow legal pad throughout the day
3
At day's end, attorney/Melissa manually looks up each client/matter in MyCase
4
Time entries typed into MyCase at $140–$395/hr depending on attorney tier
5
Draft invoices → Melissa reviews → attorney approves → sent to client
⚠ 30 min/day lost to manual re-entry + 10 billable hrs/month unrecorded = $99,540/yr at stake

📧  Inbox Triage & Email Management

1
Attorneys receive high email volumes — courts, clients, opposing counsel, new inquiries
2
Manual scanning: Attorney reads/skims inbox to identify urgent items
3
During court appearances, inbox goes unmonitored for hours
4
Attorney responds, delegates, or flags — no automated urgency classification exists
⚠ Critical emails missed during court blocks (Corbin Gordon)

📄  Document Drafting (Litigation)

1
Attorney identifies need — demand letter, motion, engagement letter
2
Template hunting: Attorney locates a prior similar document in Box or local drive
3
Attorney manually substitutes party names, case facts, and specific terms
4
Document reviewed, revised, approved internally before service or filing
5
Filed or served; Bates-stamped if discovery-related
⚠ ~75 docs/month · 1.5 hrs avg. manual drafting per document

🗂️  Case Management & MyCase Operations

1
GLG maintains ~1,223 open cases across litigation, municipal law, and estate planning
2
Client lookups performed manually by Melissa or attorneys for billing/correspondence
3
Court deadline tracking maintained in Google Calendar, separate from MyCase
4
Documents stored in Box; referenced by Bates number in discovery matters
⚠ No automated bridge between case data and front-office workflows

Discovery Session Log

SessionParticipantsFocus AreasKey Output
Apr 27 — KickoffJosh Jewkes, Melissa, SolveBilling workflow, MyCase usage, pain pointsYellow-pad problem · "10/10" severity confirmed
May 1 — Billing Deep DiveJosh Jewkes, MelissaTime entry flow, rate structure, invoice approvalCrawl/Walk/Run scope defined; API requirements locked
May 7 — Process ReviewMelissaMyCase workflow, rate tiers, draft → approve → sendBilling automation requirements finalized
May — Litigation SessionJosh Jewkes, SolveDiscovery process, Bates numbering, case tiersDocument drafting automation scoped; Perry PRD initiated
May — Security ReviewCorbin Gordon, SolveData handling, attorney-client privilege, AI policySecurity architecture requirements; BAA need confirmed
Section 02

Automation Opportunities

Three high-impact automation opportunities were identified and prioritized from discovery. Each is addressed by a dedicated AI agent, sequenced to deliver fastest time-to-value while managing privilege risk and implementation complexity.

Phase 1 · Billy

Voice-First Billable Time Capture

★ Highest Priority

Root Problem: Attorneys rely on handwritten yellow-pad notes and deferred manual MyCase entry, introducing billing leakage rated "10/10" severity by Josh Jewkes.

Supporting Observations

~1,223 active matters in MyCase require frequent lookup during billing. Manual client search is the primary daily bottleneck.
Rate tiers span $140–$395/hr. Incorrect rate application during manual entry creates invoice corrections that waste Melissa's time and delay revenue.
Driving and post-court time is currently unbillable capture time. A voice-first interface enables hands-free entry immediately after completing work.
Tenth-hour billing increments (0.1 hr) require precision. Billy suggests durations and asks for confirmation — reducing attorney cognitive load and error rate.
Two distinct value streams: Billy eliminates 30 min/day of manual re-entry (Stream 1: $52,140/yr in recovered attorney time) AND enables 10 additional billable hrs/month through more accurate real-time capture (Stream 2: $47,400/yr in new revenue). Combined: $99,540/year.
30 minAdmin time saved/day
$99,540Combined annual value
5.8×Year-1 ROI multiple
Phase 2 · Miley

AI-Powered Email Triage Assistant

★ High Priority

Root Problem: Corbin Gordon operates in courtrooms where inbox monitoring is impossible. Urgent emails surface hours late with no automated urgency signal.

Supporting Observations

Corbin's municipal law practice involves court appearances spanning full mornings — during which his inbox goes entirely unmonitored.
Classification, not summarization, is the correct design principle. SMS alerts carry only metadata — never privileged content.
Google Workspace is GLG's email platform of record. Gmail API with OAuth is the Phase 1 foundation.
Security posture: Email content is never stored in the database, never transmitted in SMS, and all OAuth tokens are encrypted at rest.
45 minSaved/day (Corbin, avg)
$77,025Annual recovered value
4.9×Year-1 ROI multiple
Phase 3 · Perry

AI Paralegal Document Drafting Assistant

Sequenced After Billy + Miley

Root Problem: GLG generates ~75 legal documents per month requiring ~1.5 hrs of manual drafting each. Perry automates first drafts via RAG over the firm's own template library, with mandatory attorney approval.

Supporting Observations

Bates numbering is part of GLG's litigation workflow. Perry detects and cites existing Bates numbers in every output.
Attorney-always-in-loop: Perry drafts first. It can submit, file, or send — but only with explicit attorney approval on every single action.
Zero-retention enterprise AI: Metadata stripping + US-only data residency ensure client data never travels identifiably to third-party AI providers.
Template library in Box provides the RAG source material. GLG will annotate 10–30 core templates with variable placeholders to initialize the system.
Court deadline tracking from Notices of Event Due Dates is surfaced contextually in Perry outputs (read-only display in MVP).
75 docsProcessed/month
$128,250Annual recovered value
5.7×Year-1 ROI multiple
Section 03

Technical Architecture & Per-Product Scope

For each of the three IntelliFirm products, this section documents the recommended technical stack, the explicit MVP scope (in and out), key assumptions, and the factors that could affect timeline or scope. Billy's scope is confirmed and ready for build. Miley and Perry remain preliminary pending the open questions surfaced during discovery — each is flagged in its own section below for resolution before formal SOWs are issued.

Phase 1 · Billy

AI Billing Assistant — Voice-First PWA

✓ Scope Confirmed — Ready for Build
Recommended Tech Stack
Frontend
Nuxt 4 + TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, shadcn-vue. Installable PWA on iOS, Android, macOS, Windows. Offline-aware for session resumption.
Voice + AI
OpenAI Realtime API (WebSocket, sub-second latency). Native barge-in interruption + native mid-conversation tool calling. Prompt caching enabled from day one.
Backend & Data
Supabase — Postgres + Row-Level Security + magic-link auth. Invite-only (no public signup in MVP). Encrypted OAuth tokens.
Integration
MyCase (8am) Open API — read-only OAuth. Client + matter lookup, contextual rate & prior-entry data to inform suggestions.
Outbound
Resend or AWS SES — structured time-entry summary emails to designated billing staff for MyCase entry.
Hosting
Vercel or Cloudflare Pages, both Nuxt-optimized. Supabase Cloud for database, auth, storage.
In Scope (MVP)
Everything below is included in the Billy build
Product — Attorney-facing PWA
Deployed PWA installable across iOS, Android, macOS, and Windows — listed in both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store (Solve handles app-store assets, screenshots, and listing copy).
Phone-call–style voice interface with continuous-conversation mode and barge-in (interruption) support, powered by the OpenAI Realtime API.
MyCase read-only client and matter lookup via OAuth — token refresh handled automatically, refresh tokens encrypted at rest.
Structured time-entry email summaries delivered to designated billing staff (Melissa) with the context needed for MyCase entry without follow-up questions.
Conversation history with full per-session transcript view — attorneys can resume interrupted sessions or audit prior submissions.
Settings page: MyCase connection, recipient email, per-user usage and estimated monthly cost surfaced in real time.
Collaborative AI behavior: Billy asks clarifying questions on ambiguous client matches rather than guessing; reads back final entries before send.
Platform — Multi-Tenant from Day One
Multi-tenant architecture from day one — per-user accounts with Supabase Row-Level Security ensuring complete data isolation between firms.
Public sign-up flow with seat-based licensing — single attorneys through full firms can self-onboard, assigning seats by email address.
Stripe-powered subscription management with self-serve plan administration (upgrade, downgrade, cancel, seat count changes).
Subscription pricing model: $20/month standard tier + usage-based markup on AI API consumption. Billing logic supports flexible plan tiers.
Redis-based rate limiting with configurable per-window, per-day, and per-month limits to prevent runaway usage.
LLM provider abstraction layer — OpenAI-API-compatible interface designed for future provider swap-out (alternative vendors or self-hosted models) without application rewrites.
Public marketing landing page on Solve's standard stack (Next.js + Supabase + Vercel) with branded design system shared across the product family.
Solve-Led Compliance & Legal
HIPAA BAA negotiation with OpenAI — handled by Solve's in-house legal team (including a licensed attorney). One BAA covers all customers of the platform.
Data ingress / egress security diagrams documenting every boundary where client data travels and the controls applied at each step — shareable with GLG's malpractice carrier or state-bar reviewers.
AI-use disclosure templates aligned with Utah State Bar guidance — drafted by Solve legal for GLG to adapt as needed for their client communications.
Standard security posture: all data encrypted in transit (HTTPS / WSS), Supabase encryption at rest, no audio retention (transcripts only), no model training on API data.
Delivery & Handoff
Source code delivered via private Git repository accessible to Solve and GLG.
Admin documentation: how to invite users, rotate credentials, view logs.
Weekly progress sync calls with Corbin, Josh, the Solve team, and the engineering lead — collaborative iteration through delivery.
Key Assumptions
  • GLG is on MyCase Advanced Tier (Open API access prerequisite — paid to 8am, not Solve).
  • GLG provides a designated technical or administrative point of contact for testing & feedback.
  • Up to three attorneys participate in the live-testing window after MVP delivery.
  • Solve's legal team owns Utah State Bar compliance documentation and the OpenAI BAA workflow.
Section 03 (cont'd)

Miley — Email Triage Assistant

Miley is the highest-stakes product in the IntelliFirm suite from a privilege and confidentiality standpoint, because it reads attorney inboxes. The architecture below is intentionally conservative: classification, not comprehension; SMS metadata only, not email content; no data retained beyond classification outputs and audit logs.

Phase 2 · Miley

AI Email Triage — SMS Alert Engine

◐ Preliminary — Open Questions Below
Recommended Tech Stack
Frontend
Nuxt 4 PWA, Tailwind, shadcn-vue. Settings + alert-history + importance-rule editor UI.
Backend & Data
Supabase — Postgres + RLS + magic-link, invite-only. Email content never stored; only classification outputs & audit metadata.
Background Processing
Supabase Edge Functions or dedicated worker. Subscribes to inbox change notifications; classifies new messages in near-real-time.
Email Integration
Google Workspace OAuth (GLG's platform of record). Refresh tokens encrypted at rest with envelope encryption.
AI / Classification
Two-stage: fast heuristic filter (allowlist, keyword/court-domain patterns) → LLM urgency scoring on the subset that passes. OpenAI GPT-4 class — same vendor family as Billy for stack consistency and shared BAA coverage. Built behind the same provider-abstraction layer so swap-out remains painless.
Alerting
Twilio SMS — metadata only (sender category, counts, urgency signals). Never email content.
In Scope (MVP)
Everything below is included in the Miley build
Inbox & Classification
Google Workspace OAuth inbox connection, per attorney — refresh tokens encrypted at rest with envelope encryption.
Two-stage classifier: fast heuristic filter (allowlist, keyword/court-domain patterns) → LLM urgency scoring on the subset that passes. Structured JSON output, no tool access.
Prompt-injection hardening — HTML stripped, attachments excluded, content passed as data not instructions.
Audit logs of every classification decision for dispute resolution or review.
Attorney-Controlled Personalization
Classification-weight sliders per attorney — each user widens or narrows the threshold for each category (urgent-client, court-deadline, opposing-counsel, etc.) without writing prompts.
Custom if-then rules per attorney — e.g., "alert me whenever the word 'Corbin' appears" or "always SMS me if the sender is on this list."
Onboarding flow that walks each attorney through sample emails from their own inbox to calibrate their initial alert thresholds.
Importance-rule configuration UI with reasonable system defaults out of the box.
Alerting
Twilio SMS alerts — metadata only (sender category, counts, urgency signals). Never email content.
Configurable cadence: immediate, batched (e.g., every 2 hours), or scheduled digest (morning / afternoon / evening).
Configurable quiet hours / do-not-disturb windows.
Alert-history view per attorney for after-the-fact review.
Platform Inheritance from Billy
Multi-tenant architecture, public sign-up, Stripe subscription management, Redis rate limiting, and the LLM provider-abstraction layer — all reused from Billy's foundation.
Same OpenAI BAA, same security posture, same Utah State Bar disclosure templates — Solve legal already owns the compliance workflow.
Key Assumptions
  • Google Workspace is GLG's email platform of record — confirmed during discovery.
  • Initial importance-rule set is derived from discovery sessions with Corbin Gordon and iterated with each attorney during onboarding.
  • Solve's legal team owns Utah State Bar compliance documentation, AI-use disclosures, and the OpenAI BAA workflow.
  • LLM provider is OpenAI to match Billy and reuse the same BAA / provider abstraction.
◐ Open Questions to Confirm with GLG
  • Urgency-rule taxonomy — which signals does GLG consider urgent at launch? (Current clients, opposing counsel on active matters, court-deadline keywords, court-domain senders, staff-marked-urgent — pick the initial set.)
  • Per-attorney inbox volume profile for one representative week — used to calibrate cost projections and tune the heuristic filter.
  • Number of attorneys participating in the initial Miley rollout (seat count for the GLG instance).
Section 03 (cont'd)

Perry — AI Paralegal Document Assistant

Perry produces first drafts for attorney review and editing — never finished legal work. The attorney is always in the loop. This positioning aligns with current state bar guidance on AI use in legal practice and is the primary reason Perry's privilege exposure is lower than Miley's: Perry operates only when invoked, not continuously, and never sends, files, or finalizes anything.

Phase 3 · Perry

AI Paralegal — RAG-Driven Drafting Engine

◐ Preliminary — Open Questions Below
Recommended Tech Stack
Frontend
Nuxt 4 PWA, Tailwind, shadcn-vue. Chat interface for drafting; admin UI for template management; review/download view.
Backend & Data
Supabase — Postgres + pgvector + RLS + magic-link. Per-user RLS on templates and drafts. Audit logging on every generation.
File Storage
Supabase Storage for original templates, example completions, and generated drafts — all encrypted at rest.
Document Generation
docxtemplater (or equivalent template-aware library). DOCX output preserves the firm's original styling, formatting, signature blocks.
AI / Drafting
Anthropic Claude — preferred for instruction-following and reduced hallucination on legal-adjacent drafting. No training on API data; documented for GLG.
RAG
pgvector embeddings on template descriptions + example content. Semantic similarity ranking; attorney always confirms the chosen template before drafting.
In Scope (MVP)
Everything below is included in the Perry build
Template Management — Firm-Specific RAG
Per-firm custom RAG implementation — every firm onboarded gets its own indexed template library; templates and embeddings never cross firm boundaries.
Admin UI for template upload — variable markers, natural-language descriptions, and 1–2 example completions per template.
Template versioning — prior versions retained for audit; firms can roll back without losing history.
pgvector-based semantic search across template descriptions + example content for accurate template suggestions.
Drafting Experience — Attorney-Always-in-the-Loop
Conversational drafting flow: attorney describes the need → Perry surfaces candidate templates → attorney confirms → Perry asks structured intake questions → Perry generates the draft.
DOCX output preserving the firm's original template styling, formatting, and signature blocks.
Iterative natural-language editing — "make the indemnification stronger," "change governing law to Idaho," "add a confidentiality clause." Perry produces a revised draft each round.
Draft history per attorney with full audit logging — every generation request and template choice recorded.
Bates citation detection in every output — aligns with GLG's litigation workflow.
Configurable draft-retention policy — firm sets the auto-delete window for generated drafts.
Premium Onboarding — AI Paralegal Activation
"Hiring an AI paralegal" onboarding experience — 1–2 week guided activation period during which Solve helps the firm load templates, calibrate prompts, and validate output quality on real documents before go-live.
Practice-area-specific prompt tuning during the activation window.
Iterative testing protocol with the firm's attorneys — Perry produces drafts on representative matters; attorneys flag issues; Solve tunes; repeat.
Platform Inheritance from Billy & Miley
Multi-tenant architecture, Stripe subscription management, Redis rate limiting, and the LLM provider-abstraction layer — all inherited from the shared IntelliFirm foundation.
Per-user RLS on templates and drafts — attorneys never see another attorney's work.
Same BAA, same security posture, same Utah State Bar disclosure templates — Solve legal already owns the compliance workflow.
Key Assumptions
  • GLG provides 10–30 representative templates with marked placeholders and at least one example completion per template at activation.
  • A designated firm-side person owns template upload, annotation, and validation through the activation period.
  • An attorney-review workflow exists or is defined alongside Perry deployment — Perry produces drafts; attorneys verify before any document is sent or filed.
  • Solve's legal team owns Utah State Bar compliance documentation, AI-use disclosures, and the OpenAI BAA workflow.
◐ Open Questions to Confirm with GLG
  • Practice area focus for the initial activation — litigation, municipal, or estate planning? Different practice areas produce very different first templates.
  • Template volume estimate — rough order of magnitude for the initial template library at activation.
  • Firm-side template owner — who at GLG uploads, annotates, and validates templates? Good Perry output requires good template inputs.
  • MyCase client/matter prefill — fold into the initial activation, or layer in as an enhancement once Perry is in production?

How this rolls forward into the partnership

Billy is locked. The architecture, scope, and assumptions above represent the formal Phase 1 SOW, ready for signature on engagement.

Miley and Perry remain preliminary. Each carries a short list of open questions — resolvable in a single 60-minute working session post-roadmap-acceptance. Once resolved, Solve will produce formal SOWs with specific timelines and acceptance criteria for each.

The three products share one foundation. Nuxt 4 + Supabase + Vercel/Cloudflare, with the auth, RLS, hosting, and PWA scaffolding established in Billy reused by Miley and Perry. That reuse is by design — and it's part of why the partnership pricing for the second and third products stays where it is.

Section 04

Projected Return on Investment

SOW #1 commits to demonstrating a projected return of at least 200% on GLG's $17,000 cash investment. The analysis quantifies recovered value across all three products using billing rates and time savings confirmed during discovery.

Phase 1 · Billy
AI Billing Assistant
$99,540
Combined annual value (2 streams)

Billing rate (Josh Jewkes)$395/hr
Stream 1: Admin time saved/day30 min
Stream 1: Hrs saved/year132 hrs → $52,140
Stream 2: New billable hrs/month10 hrs
Stream 2: New revenue/year120 hrs → $47,400
GLG cash investment$17,175
Net Year-1 return+$82,365
ROI multiple5.8×
Phase 2 · Miley
Email Triage Assistant
$77,025
Estimated annual recovered value

Billing rate (Corbin Gordon)$395/hr
Saved/day45 min
Saved/year195 hrs
GLG cash investment$15,560
Net Year-1 return+$61,465
ROI multiple4.9×
Phase 3 · Perry
AI Paralegal Assistant
$128,250
Estimated annual recovered value

Paralegal billing rate$95/hr
Docs drafted/month75
Hours saved/year1,350 hrs
GLG cash investment$22,490
Net Year-1 return+$105,760
ROI multiple5.7×

Combined ROI Summary

ProductAnnual ValueGLG Cash OutlaySolve In-KindNet Year-1 ReturnROI Multiple
Billy — AI Billing Assistant$99,540$17,175$17,175+$82,3655.8×
Miley — Email Triage$77,025$15,560$15,560+$61,4654.9×
Perry — AI Paralegal$128,250$22,490$22,490+$105,7605.7×
Full Suite — Combined$304,815/yr$55,225$55,225+$249,590/yr5.5× blended
SOW #1 Commitment Met: Billy alone delivers a projected 5.8× return (Year 1) on GLG's $17,175 investment — combining $52,140 in recovered admin time (30 min/day) and $47,400 in new billable revenue (10 hrs/month). The full suite delivers a blended 5.5× return — $249,590 in net annual value.

Estimated Monthly Operating Costs

ServicePurposeBillyMileyPerryCombined Est./Mo.
OpenAI / Anthropic APIAI inference$25–50$15–60$30–120$70–230
SupabaseDatabase, auth$0–25$0–25$0–25~$25
Twilio SMSMiley alerts$5–25$5–25
Vercel / CloudflareApp hosting$0–20$0–20$0–20~$20
Estimated Total Monthly Operating Cost (Full Suite)~$120–$300/mo
Section 05

Recommended Implementation Plan

The phased build plan sequences all three products to deliver value incrementally while managing privilege risk and GLG's partnership investment. No sprint begins until the prior product is accepted.

Phase 0 — Complete
Paid Discovery (SOW #1)
$5,000 — Credited toward full build
Apr 27 – May 26, 2026
5–10 discovery sessions completed
Workflow documentation (this document)
Automation opportunities scored
ROI modeling finalized
AI-use disclosure draft prepared
Technical Solutions Roadmap delivered
✓ $5,000 Paid — Credited to Billy build
1
Phase 1 — Start Immediately
Billy — AI Billing Assistant PWA
$34,350 total · GLG pays $17,175 · Solve contributes $17,175 in-kind
May 26 – June 18, 2026
Deployed PWA (iOS, Android, macOS, Windows)
OpenAI Realtime voice interface (barge-in)
MyCase OAuth (read-only client/matter lookup)
Supabase + RLS + invite-only auth
Email delivery of time-entry summaries
Conversation history + transcript view
Settings page (MyCase, email, usage monitor)
Admin documentation + Git repo delivery
✓ $5,000 Already Paid$3,588 Due at Sprint Start$8,587 Due on Acceptance
2
Phase 2 — Begins After Billy Acceptance
Miley — AI Email Triage Assistant
$31,120 total · GLG pays $15,560 · Solve contributes $15,560 in-kind
~June 18 – July 23, 2026
Google Workspace OAuth inbox connection
Two-stage AI classification engine
Fast heuristic filter (allowlist, keywords, court domains)
LLM classification (Claude / GPT-4 class)
SMS alerts via Twilio (metadata only)
Configurable cadence and quiet hours
Alert history + importance rule editor
Prompt injection hardening + audit logs
$7,780 Due at Sprint Start$7,780 Due on Acceptance (July 23)
3
Phase 3 — Begins After Miley Acceptance
Perry — AI Paralegal Document Assistant
$44,980 total · GLG pays $22,490 · Solve contributes $22,490 in-kind
~July 23 – Sept 17, 2026
Template management admin UI (upload, annotate, version)
RAG indexing via pgvector (Supabase)
Conversational drafting chat interface
DOCX output preserving template styling
Iterative natural-language revision
Bates citation detection in all outputs
Court deadline surface from Notice docs
Zero-retention AI + metadata stripping
$11,245 Due at Sprint Start$11,245 Due on Acceptance (Sept 17)

Timeline Overview

PhaseProductStartTarget CompletionDurationGLG Payment Milestone
Phase 0Discovery (SOW #1)Apr 27May 26, 2026 ✓4 weeks$5,000 (paid)
Phase 1BillyMay 26June 18, 20263.5 weeks$3,588 now + $8,587 on acceptance
Phase 2MileyJune 18July 23, 20265 weeks$7,780 now + $7,780 on acceptance
Phase 3PerryJuly 23Sept 17, 20268 weeks$11,245 now + $11,245 on acceptance
Total Program Duration~20 weeks$55,225 remaining GLG cash investment
Section 06

Partnership Model & Investment Summary

This engagement is structured as a co-development partnership. GLG and Solve jointly own the resulting IP through a Special Purpose Entity, enabling GLG to generate licensing revenue from the platform beyond their own practice.

Special Purpose Entity — IntelliFirm IP Ownership

Per Section 6 of SOW #1, the Parties will form an LLC to own all intellectual property from the full build. GLG's $5,000 Discovery Fee is treated as an initial Class A capital contribution upon SPE formation.

51%
Gordon Law Group, P.C.
Majority owner · Founding client
49%
Solve Technology Solutions
Technology partner · Build contributor
First-Mover AdvantageGLG's workflows shape the product before any competitor has access. You become the reference customer.
Revenue Share (51/49)Net licensing revenue from other firms using IntelliFirm flows back to GLG proportionally per the SPE operating agreement.
Dollar-for-Dollar MatchFor every dollar GLG contributes in cash, Solve contributes the equivalent in development services — reducing GLG's total outlay by 50%.

IntelliFirm — Full Suite Investment

GLG total cash investment · Solve matched in-kind · Target completion September 17, 2026

Billy — AI Billing Assistant
Target: June 18, 2026
$34,350
$17,175
$12,175
Miley — Email Triage Assistant
Target: July 23, 2026
$31,120
$15,560
$15,560
Perry — AI Paralegal Assistant
Target: September 17, 2026
$44,980
$22,490
$22,490
Total Platform Value
$110,450
GLG Total Cash Investment
$55,225
Already Paid
$5,000 ✓

Security & Compliance Architecture

🔒
Zero-Retention AI EndpointsEnterprise agreements with OpenAI and Anthropic ensure GLG's data is never stored, never used for training, and never accessible after the API call completes.
🛡️
Row-Level Security (RLS)Supabase RLS policies ensure every attorney sees only their own data. Cross-user data leakage is architecturally impossible.
✉️
Privileged Content Never in SMSMiley alerts contain only metadata — sender category, urgency signals, count. Email content is never transmitted via SMS.
🔑
Encrypted Credentials at RestAll OAuth tokens (MyCase, Google Workspace) stored encrypted using pgcrypto or KMS-backed envelope encryption. No passwords stored.
📋
Metadata Stripping (Perry)Client names and identifying metadata are replaced with UUIDs before reaching any cloud AI provider. Privileged content never travels identifiably.
⚖️
Attorney Always in the LoopPerry cannot send, file, or finalize any document without explicit attorney approval on every action.
Next Steps: Upon GLG's acceptance of this roadmap, the $3,588 Billy sprint deposit activates Phase 1. Solve will schedule weekly progress syncs with GLG, Corbin, Josh, and the engineering team throughout each phase.
SOLVE
Solve Technology Solutions, LLC · solvetech.ai
Document Reference
MSA/SOW #1 · 8B95BBA7-85D9-441C
Delivered May 26, 2026 · Version 1.0
CONFIDENTIAL